DJ'ing=Decoupage for the digital era
by Knox Bronson (with props to "Actual Physical War on DJ's")and Nobody Cares That You Are a DJ")
Did you hear the one about the DJs?
One DJ said to another,"Do you want to go to a movie?"
And the other one replied,"I don't know ... who's the projectionist?"
In a just and fair world, DJs, if mentioned at
all in the press, would be relegated to the business pages where they
belong. But this is not a just and fair world and the marketers have
taken over every aspect of culture. Therefore, there is no culture,
only carefully crafted messages or products targetted at a
certain demographic niche.
And I have heard it so many times: "You don't
know what you are talking about! There's Z-Trip and Q-Bert ... !" and
God knows who else.
I watched the movie "Scratch," which was quite
enlightening and made me much more conscious of the "art" of
turntablism and I have come to realize that DJ's are, at best, modern
pecussionists, drummers, for lack of a better word - and, as anybody who knows about music will tell you ... drummers are the natural enemy of singers.
So ... spare me the wailing and the gnashing
of teeth: 99.9% of the DJs out there are hat-wearing poseurs, in it for the money and the girls, and you
know it's true.
As an aside: I
have loved the radio DJs, from the glory days of AM radio and the true
underground FM in San Francisco - KMPX - where it started, up to the
crews today at KCRW, KALX ... Steve Masters' reign as program director
at Live105 in the 80's ... Steve Jones' Jonesie's Jukebox in LA today
... Nic Harcourt et al @ KCRW - for over
45 years! So they do not factor into this article in any way.
"The Grey Album," by Dangermouse, and the
attendant media frenzy makes further silence about the decline of creativity in the world of
popular music impossible.
I just got into
a huge argument with my 20 year old son. I was listening to a RealAudio
clip from an NPR website about the hoopla surrounding the
mixtape/mashup release by Brian Burton, aka DJ Dangermouse, of the
"Grey Album," wherein he has sliced the greatest pop album of all time
(The Beatles "White Album") and mixed the resulting mishmash with the a
capella raps of one of today's biggest stars, Jay-Z, from his recently
released "Black Album."
And I was cussing under my breath several feet away from him. He looked
away from the MTV Hiphop Top 10 show to ask what the problem was.
I savaged Mr. Mouse and his misappropriation and butchering of
cultural treasures. My son sprang to his defense, which, in retrospect,
is kind of funny, because I know for a fact that he had not yet heard the
"Grey Album." But my comments were about DJ's in general and I suppose
this was more of a generation gap skirmish.
Still, it got my ire up and I said,"When you have spent years working
on music and learning how to play an instrument and how to arrange
music, you will not defend this pinhead so strongly."
"Dad," he replied,"it's JUST A MIXTAPE!"
And he was right, but he did call me long distance a week prior to this
discussion to see if I knew where to find this particular mixtape
online.
It is the most well-known mixtape of all time, now.
There has been huge media attention. The staid Wall Street Journal had
a half-page feature on the phenomenon of the "Grey Album." The New York
Times reviewed and discussed the implications of its release and the
resultant cease-and-desist order on behalf of EMI, giving DangermOuse
publicity beyond calculation. Also mentioned was the subsequent
destruction of the remaining CDs, and the organinzing of 150 website to
offer free downloads of the album on "Grey Tuesday" at the end of
February. This was a problem: a virus had infected media and could not
be contained. (I'm aware I'm part of it right here, thank you.)
Even more amazingly, the British music magazine, Q, has just included
Dangermouse in its 100 most important people in the music biz list.
Something has gone seriously wrong with our culture if a craftsman as
sloppy as Dangermouse (can't even make up his own name, stole it from
an English cartoon) is elevated to such Olympian heights.
Before we go any further, let me say that the "Grey Album" is almost
unlistenable and truly does not merit the attention it has received. I
happen to like Jay-Z quite a bit and I grew up with the Beatles—I can
still rememberwhere and when I heard many of their singles the first
time—and I love all kinds of music, from classical to experimental
electronic music, but the sad fact is that Burton has no musical
talent. His loops are sloppy, his drum programming stunted.
Sadly, the "Grey Album" would have come and gone as quickly as any
runner-up on American Idol, had it not been for the laziness, as well
as the cluelessness, of the mainstream media who played this farce as
some seminal event in pop music history.
Like most DJ's, he lives off other people's creativity and hard work.
By his own accord, he put two and a half weeks into the "Grey Album."
As one who has put 4 days into arranging and orchestrating two bars of
original music, I am not impressed by his effort. All he did was slice
audio & pull out samples from the mix and used them to make "beats"
to go under Jay-Z's raps.
The vast majority of DJ's are masters of one, and only one artform: that of endless and grandiose self-promotion.
DJ Lord, from Georgia, said it best: " I see myself as a messenger. I
mean, I didn't father sound. I'm just a host and this particular sound
manifests itself through me. I'm just happy that I'm not at a degree of
mastery to where I can control it, somewhat."
If you can decipher that last sentence, please let me know. In fact, while you are at it, please let DJ Lord know.
Not for them the painful hours and days and years that are required to
master an instrument, the excruciating frustration that makes one want
to literally throw the guitar out the window nor days creaking by as
one meticulously struggles to arrange a delicate interlude.
No, the DJ spends three hours learning how to beat-match and then buys
a hat. Some buy the hat first. DJ's, for those of you uninitiated, must
wear hats.
DJ apologists are quick to point out that many DJ's make their own
music, but even most of those work with producers who do the actual
writing and arranging (the DJ will say "put a whirly sound here and a
drum-roll there and then the breakdown...") and the DJ will put his
name on it. I can think of a gang of DJ's in SF right now who have made
their careers outright stealing music from people.
Another local DJ/musician told a [performing electronic musician]
friend of mine,"I get paid $4000 for DJ'ing. And $1500 to perform my
own music. If you want to make it as a dance artist, just find the
cheesiest house track out there, sample it, loop it, thrown some shit
on top of it, give it a cool name and you'll be huge."
But back to the Grey Album. Burton knows to spin (in the old sense of
the word, as in spinning tales), parse, finesse, and redirect the
discussion of his thievery.
He describes his work thusly (I have deconstructed, to use an already overused term, his remarks below):
"If you had like ... uh ... an empty coke can sitting on the table and
you had a knife and cut it up and peeled it back and made a bird out of
it.1 But if you tried to pour water in it, it'd fall out all over the
place 'cuz it's not supposed to hold water any more.2 And that's kind
of the way l wanted to look at this record—it's not supposed to be
bangin' in the clubs3 ... my intent was for it to stand on its own
and then ... you know ... see what happens."4
Burton identifies Harrison's "Long Long Long" as the song that
"essentially opens the album"5 and talks about how he had to alter
the 3/4 time signature to fit Jay-Z's "Public Service Announcement,"
which, like almost all Hip-hop and club music, is 4/4. "I knew there
was ... that this was going to be, if this did get to any certain
level, it would bring up a lot of questions that I just don't have the
answers to. Not to try to be funny or anything ... there's a lot of
grey area with this whole thing ... I just don't know. I don't know."6
- Uh no, Brian ... you did not take the empty coke can and make a
bird out it. You took the coke itself and mixed it with someone else's
wonderful work of art akin to, say, vanilla ice cream and made a float.
The only difference is that the "Grey Album" is sloppy, unmusical, full
of mediocre loop editing and pathetic drum programming, whereas a coke
float is a timeless treat in the author's opinion.
- Again, spin control: if "Grey Album" should stand on its own, it
must hold water. If it cannot (and in reality does not) stand on its
own, it is merely a garbled, attention-grabbing, pointer back to the
original works. In other words, he has defaced the canvasses of
masterworks with his own sloppy, spray-painted tag.
- Translation: " I pray to God it gets played in the clubs."
- Translation: "I couldn't create an original piece of music if my
life depended on it, but I bet I can get some press if I play this
right."
- Uh, no, Brian ... "Back in the USSR" opens the album. "Long Long
Long" was the last song on side 3 of the original double album.
- But you do know Brian: you know you are simply stealing and mixing
the work of others, great artists, who worked for years in obscurity
(both the Beatles and Jay-Z), mastering their craft, learning how to
write songs, paying their dues in hell-holes hither thither and yon.
The reality is that like all thieves with a "philosophy" or a
"manifesto" (i.e. socialists and communists, or that percentage of
clerics on the oil dole with nothing to do but foment anti-American
fever, or the [energy industry] worms who put Bush in office, and, of
course, most DJ's), he masks his crimes in a language that not only
absolves him of any guilt, but lends moral, aesthetic, or spiritual
justification, if not superiority, to his chosen racket.
The album’s profile may have gotten even bigger when the music activism
(note to self: add "activist" to list of thieves) site
downhillbattle.org urged fans to post the music on Web sites for a day
to protest EMI’s cease-and-desist order. Nicholas Reville, a co-founder
of the site, says more than 150 sites participated.
“What’s going on is that EMI is censoring a work of art,” he said. “Not
only are they telling musicians the kind of music they can or cannot
create, they’re trying to tell the public what we can and cannot listen
to. We think EMI’s attempts to censor it and prevent the public from
hearing it are a huge problem and we shouldn’t allow that kind of
corporate censorship.”
Note to Nick: if you want to go after the recording industry, the RIAA,
EMI, and all the rest, great, but don't do it at the expense of the
Beatles and Jay-Z. The "Grey Album," mixtape mashup, so poorly
executed, diminishes both.
NPR reporter Joel Rose said "The Grey Album" was downloaded 100,000
times in the past week, making it a top 10 album. No, Joel, it is not a
top-10 album: no one paid for it. Reporting it as such won't increase
your chances of getting laid.
And no one would have noticed had not EMI and the RIAA gotten involved.
We can thank them for all the hype surrounding the mediocrity for this.
Invariably, younger people accuse me of just being an old fart, out of touch.
And that, of course, is true. But, unlike many of my boomer peers, I
have great respect for the range of Eminem's talent, and how he speaks
for my sons like John Lennon spoke for us. I also have spent some
memorable nights at some great clubs where a great DJ kept the crowd
dancing far past sweaty exhaustion ... it was wonderful what they did
on those nights. And I respect the craft that goes into maintaining
that level of energy on the dancefloor.
But DJ's rarely put themselves on the line as artists, like performing
musicians, especially singers, do. Singers stand in front of audiences
and open their very souls in order to make a connection that means
something with the people in the crowd. I have experienced that with
certain performers over the years and I carry them with me in my heart
to this day. I cannot say that about some excellent DJ sets I have
heard - I remember the lights, the sweat, the four hot girls dancing
dirty nearby.
But not the song.
This kind of connection cannot take place within the structure of the
DJ craft: The DJ simply plays records. Occasionally, a DJ will throw in
some effects or mixer tricks or on-the-fly samples to great effect and
these require a certain flair for invention, but in the sober light of
day ... who in the crowd will really remember?
I have had an intermittent correspondence with Ishkur, whose excellent
Electronic Music Guide is an amazing and essential resource for anybody
interested in the very short, but complex, history of electronic dance
music—all the major genres, their sub-genres, and the sub-sub-genres,
with at least four audio samples of each, and their antecedents and
inter-relationships defined in Ishkur's breezy and informed style.
I was able to determine that, beyond any shadow of a doubt that
Plastikman's "Consumed" and Aphex Twin's "Xtal," both in the Ambient
Techno section, were one and the same song, although in a different
key. (I know ... how many versions of "Satisfaction" have made #1 ...
let's see ... "Wild Thing," "Gloria," "You're Pushin' Too Hard," the
list goes on ... but hey, the Golden Rules of Pop [#1 - if it worked
once, it'll work again] apply to electronica as well.)
In any case, Ishkur is a younger man who longs for the purity of the
[rave and dance] scene he encountered as a youth, much as I long for
the purity of 60's and 70's pop). And while he agreed with much of this
article when I showed him an earlier version, we finally reached an
impasse. He wrote:
I think there's another factor about DJing that you don't really touch
up on, and is actually kind of important because it is a skill--as much
as you don't feel it should be one--that doesn't come overnight and
can't be taught: the ability to find good music.
A DJ is one-half musician, yes, but the other half--the half that makes
him or breaks him--is the business side of the equation. DJs have to be
marketers, promoters, collectors and networkers as well. They have to
get into all the obscure nooks and crannies of the underground music
world, make relationships with labels, get on mailing lists, record
pools, deal with clubs, owners, and other movers-and-shakers of the
scene.
This is not as easy as it sounds, and it takes years to build up the
sort of connections and repertoire that will really jumpstart your
career. There's more to acquiring records than just going to the store
and looking for the racks. Being a DJ is a full-time job, where you
spend at least 8-10 hours a day pouring through lists, calling people,
and go on scavenger hunts trying to find the best music for your set to
play that evening at the club. Because those records are not going to
come to you. You have to seek THEM out.
DJs are obsessive-compulsive consumers....they will spend weeks getting
their hands on just one record, and will kill to get their hands on a
promo copy of a record before everyone else does. Like real estate
agents with their special lists: Having exclusive rights to something
gives them power. White labels and dub plates are the black gold of the
DJs arsenal.
Not everyone can do this. Not everyone wants to put in the time,
care, dedication and astute diligence it requires to procure the best
records
ever, and then to keep on track of the latest happenings to stay on top
of the pack.
The dance music industry moves VERY fast, and what is popular one week is very easily played out the next.
This is reiterated by DJ Tiesto, possibly the biggest DJ in the world,
in a recent issue of Remixer magazine, a bible of DJ Culture. He goes
on about seeing Coldcut play the same songs in sets over the course of
a year (Keywords for Tiesto's further contemplation: they played and
sang songs live they had earlier written.) He said,"That's easy. I
can't go an play the same records a year later when I go spin at the
same club a year later."
I have bad news:
(1) I don't quite understand the phrase "half-musician," unless of
course we have redefined the term "musician." And I think DJ culture
has done just that. A very small percentage DJ's actually make their
own music. To be a musician you have to make music. There are musicians
who also DJ, since that's where the money and glory seems to now lie.
(2) Kissing some producer's ass to get a pre-release white-lable record
could arguably be called a skill. Networking, and promoting, and
kissing the ass of some club's booking agent could arguably be called a
skill. White men do this sort of thing, some very well, at the Rotary
Club; politicians and lobbyists in are masters of the trade-off, jackoff, suckoff in the
back rooms of Washington, D.C. Small merchants search for great new
sources at discount jewelry trade shows and exhibitions. And on and on.
(Apologies to Ishkur)
However, I do not equate this with solitary experience of making a work of art.
It's business.
So call me a stuffy and clueless old fart. (I've softened my views
greatly, as mentioned in the author's note at the top of the page. But
I just happen to love the inflammatory tone of the original article!)
The merchants have mutated our perception of what an artist is and what and artist is supposed to do.
We live in an era where bands put stickers on their cd's to announce
that a song therein has been used for a TV commercial. That would have
been the absolute KISS OF DEATH to any artist in the sixties.
"Whoever speaks in primordial images speaks with a thousand voices; he
enthralls and overpowers, while at the same time he lifts the idea he
is seeking to express out of the occasional and the transitory into the
realm of the ever-enduring. He transmutes our personal destiny into the
destiny of mankind, and evokes in us all those beneficent forces that
ever and anon have enabled humanity to find a refuge from every peril
and to outlive the longest night.
"That is the secret of great art and it's effect on us. The creative
process so far as we are able to follow it at all, consists in the
unconscious activation of an archetypal image, and in elaborating and
shaping this image into the finished work.
By giving it shape, the artist translates it into the language of the
present, and so makes it possible for us to find our way back to the
deepest springs of life." -Dr. Carl Jung
There is great scene in Sofia Coppola's "Lost in Translation."
Charlotte, played by Scarlett Johansson, is sitting in a hotel
nightclub with her husband, a vapid movie star, and a DJ. The
conversation drifts here and there, as they do, and Charlotte is
clearly bored. Then the DJ looks over at her and begins talking.
"Some crazy shit ... like breakbeat ... well I been like takin' it to
some next level shit ... like I'll take that and put a delay on it so
it's ... [slaps table rhythmically and drum-talks to demonstrate] ...
so it's involving [sic] the beat so it sounds hella large in the mix
... know what i'm sayin'?"
She looks at him and says,"No." And leaves the table.
Do DJs speak in primordial images? Could be. Do they activate
archetypal images? Maybe ... if you are peaking on E ... just kidding
...
A friend of mine says it is very hard to keep the dancefloor filled
with bodies. I guess if this is THE bottomline for great art, then yes,
there are DJs who rival Beethoven, Michaelangelo, Steinbeck. Drop the
bomb, daddy!
Several years ago, I got into the usual pro and con DJ /argument with a
young man in a SF Financial district tavern. We went back and forth,
back and forth and finally, in exasperation, I said,"Look, you are
talking to a guy who saw the Who when they still smashed their
instruments, Jimi Hendrix, and David Bowie on the Ziggy Stardust tour
and there is NO DJ on earth who can equal the kind of power and impact
those guys generated live."
This young guy paused for a moment and said,"We don't have a Jimi Hendrix."
And that, my young friends, is the saddest part of all.
|